阅读模拟 15 · 公园的隐形价值
划词查词是会员功能；查词面板（右上角按钮，或快捷键 /）不限次数，任何单词都能查。
Section A · 仔细阅读1 / 5
试卷内划词查词为会员功能 · 右上角查词面板不限
字号
Ask visitors what a city park is worth and they will describe benches, trees and a place for children. Ask the people who never go, and the answer is harder to count. Yet economists have found that a well-kept park raises the value of nearby flats by between five and fifteen percent, and that the effect reaches several streets beyond the gates. The park is doing work for people who never enter it.
This creates a familiar problem. The benefits are spread thinly over many people, while the costs — maintenance, staff, insurance — are concentrated in one budget line. When a council looks for savings, the park appears expensive and its benefits appear vague. The result is a slow decline that nobody chooses: paths are repaired less often, staff are cut, and the park becomes the kind of place people stop using, which then justifies further cuts.
Some cities have broken the pattern by measuring what was previously invisible. They count visits, but also house prices, air temperature, rainwater held during storms, and the number of hours of exercise taken in the park. Once these numbers exist, the park stops being a decoration and becomes infrastructure, and budgets follow the argument rather than the other way round.
What have economists found about city parks?
Section A · 仔细阅读2 / 5
Why are parks vulnerable in budget decisions?
Section A · 仔细阅读3 / 5
What does the author call a decline that nobody chooses?
Section A · 仔细阅读4 / 5
How have some cities broken the pattern?
Section A · 仔细阅读5 / 5
What does "budgets follow the argument" mean?
已作答 0 / 5